↓ Skip to main content

Amber facts and fancies

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Botany, October 1968
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Amber facts and fancies
Published in
Economic Botany, October 1968
DOI 10.1007/bf02908134
Authors

Judith W. Frondel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 20%
Professor 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 20%
Social Sciences 1 20%
Materials Science 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2016.
All research outputs
#4,077,425
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#121
of 861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225
of 2,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.