| Title |
Is there still a role for the lung injury score in the era of the Berlin definition ARDS?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2110-5820-4-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kirsten Neudoerffer Kangelaris, Carolyn S Calfee, Addison K May, Hanjing Zhuo, Michael A Matthay, Lorraine B Ware |
| Abstract |
The Lung Injury Score (LIS) remains a commonly utilized measure of lung injury severity though the additive value of LIS to predict ARDS outcomes over the recent Berlin definition of ARDS, which incorporates severity, is not known. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 23% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 25% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 59% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2017.
All research outputs
#18,365,132
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#906
of 1,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,627
of 223,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.