↓ Skip to main content

Dismay, Dissembly and Geocide: Ways Through the Maze of Trumpist Geopolitics

Overview of attention for article published in Law & Critique, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Dismay, Dissembly and Geocide: Ways Through the Maze of Trumpist Geopolitics
Published in
Law & Critique, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10978-017-9203-x
Authors

Philip Conway

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 50%
Social Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,416,404
of 13,605,490 outputs
Outputs from Law & Critique
#16
of 71 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,081
of 264,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Law & Critique
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,605,490 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 71 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.