| Title |
Sources of error in emergency ultrasonography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Ultrasound Journal, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2036-7902-5-s1-s1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonio Pinto, Fabio Pinto, Angela Faggian, Giuseppe Rubini, Ferdinando Caranci, Luca Macarini, Eugenio Annibale Genovese, Luca Brunese |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the common sources of diagnostic errors in emergency ultrasonography. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 156 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 47 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
| Engineering | 11 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 54 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,171,135
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Critical Ultrasound Journal
#57
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,500
of 194,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Ultrasound Journal
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them