↓ Skip to main content

Sources of error in emergency ultrasonography

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Ultrasound Journal, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Sources of error in emergency ultrasonography
Published in
Critical Ultrasound Journal, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/2036-7902-5-s1-s1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Pinto, Fabio Pinto, Angela Faggian, Giuseppe Rubini, Ferdinando Caranci, Luca Macarini, Eugenio Annibale Genovese, Luca Brunese

Abstract

To evaluate the common sources of diagnostic errors in emergency ultrasonography.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 150 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 16%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Researcher 7 5%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 39 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Engineering 9 6%
Unspecified 6 4%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 47 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,171,135
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Critical Ultrasound Journal
#57
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,500
of 194,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Ultrasound Journal
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them