↓ Skip to main content

Learning by imitation with the STIFF-FLOP surgical robot: a biomimetic approach inspired by octopus movements

Overview of attention for article published in Robotics and Biomimetics, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Learning by imitation with the STIFF-FLOP surgical robot: a biomimetic approach inspired by octopus movements
Published in
Robotics and Biomimetics, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s40638-014-0013-4
Authors

Milad S Malekzadeh, Sylvain Calinon, Danilo Bruno, Darwin G Caldwell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 23%
Student > Master 11 23%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 30 63%
Computer Science 9 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2020.
All research outputs
#20,427,593
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Robotics and Biomimetics
#35
of 39 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,246
of 256,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Robotics and Biomimetics
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 39 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.