↓ Skip to main content

Bounds of the logarithmic mean

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inequalities and Applications, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Bounds of the logarithmic mean
Published in
Journal of Inequalities and Applications, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1029-242x-2013-535
Authors

Shigeru Furuichi, Kenjiro Yanagi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 50%
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 25%
Mathematics 1 25%
Computer Science 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2014.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inequalities and Applications
#86
of 175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,623
of 224,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inequalities and Applications
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.