↓ Skip to main content

Maternal Guilt and Shame: The Role of Self-discrepancy and Fear of Negative Evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Child & Family Studies, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Maternal Guilt and Shame: The Role of Self-discrepancy and Fear of Negative Evaluation
Published in
Journal of Child & Family Studies, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10826-012-9673-2
Authors

Miriam Liss, Holly H. Schiffrin, Kathryn M. Rizzo

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 25%
Student > Master 17 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 18%
Unspecified 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Other 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 49%
Social Sciences 22 24%
Unspecified 12 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 5 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2017.
All research outputs
#10,055,507
of 11,337,824 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child & Family Studies
#619
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,004
of 267,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child & Family Studies
#40
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,337,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.