Title |
Relationships between tree size and reaction wood formation in 23 Japanese angiosperms
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Wood Science, March 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10086-017-1623-6 |
Authors |
Haruna Aiso, Futoshi Ishiguri, Tatsuya Toyoizumi, Yuya Takashima, Mineaki Aizawa, Shinso Yokota |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 21% |
Researcher | 3 | 21% |
Unspecified | 2 | 14% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 50% |
Unspecified | 2 | 14% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Materials Science | 1 | 7% |
Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2017.
All research outputs
#20,425,762
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wood Science
#203
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,755
of 309,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wood Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them