↓ Skip to main content

Adhesion of dry and wet electrostatic capture silk of uloborid spider

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Adhesion of dry and wet electrostatic capture silk of uloborid spider
Published in
The Science of Nature, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00114-015-1291-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hervé Elettro, Sébastien Neukirch, Arnaud Antkowiak, Fritz Vollrath

Abstract

We demonstrate the impressive adhesive qualities of uloborid spider orb-web capture when dry, which are lost when the nano-filament threads are wetted. A force sensor with a 50 nN-1 mN detection sensitively allowed us to measure quantitatively the stress-strain characteristics of native silk threads in both the original dry state and after wetting by controlled application of water mist with droplet sizes ranging between 3 and 5 μm and densities ranging between 10(4) and 10(5) per mm(3). Stress forces of between 1 and 5 μN/μm(2) in the native, dry multifilament thread puffs were reduced to between 0.1 and 0.5 μN/μm(2) in the wetted collapsed state, with strain displacements reducing from between 2 and 5 mm in the dry to 0.10-0.12 mm in the wetted states. We conclude that wetting cribellate threads reduce their van der Waals adhesion with implications on the thread's adhesive strength under tension. This should be considered when discussing the evolutionary transitions of capture silks from the ancestral dry-state nano-filaments of the cribellate spider taxa to the wet-state glue-droplets of the ecribellate taxa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 5 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Engineering 2 9%
Chemistry 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2018.
All research outputs
#16,223,453
of 24,677,985 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#1,884
of 2,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,568
of 267,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,677,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.