@LenGrunstein @love_my_2cats @noatishby Thank you for enlightening me, much appreciated. I know some may claim that Gaza is still occupied using the ‘effective control test’, but I’m unaware that this has been ruled upon in int. count. Interesting work he
@o7FanClub @Death2theIDF @RyanLawrence_2 @Israel Academic consensus shows that Gaza isn't being occupied: https://t.co/3MbdVIUeHC https://t.co/LuzFqZ0jOe https://t.co/uVmeReYd1b https://t.co/9C6RtAGwLk https://t.co/4ZwlmrBWR5
@mat1_u Academic consensus shows that Gaza isn't being occupied: https://t.co/3MbdVIUeHC https://t.co/LuzFqZ0jOe https://t.co/7FgOAKDXCf https://t.co/n84CD4T4Lf https://t.co/VpA9vRBS0n
@suiattempt @missymarxist Israel withdrew and sealed its borders, how's that an occupation? Do you really expect Israel to allow Hamas to control airspace, the flow of goods that ultimately get turned into missiles that are flown over to nearby Kibbutz an
@DukeJeopardy @amyalkon Well half those groups you listed actually don't. https://t.co/EFhXD6dCxx
@_JoelRayner And here’s an opinion of a different scholar to the contrary: https://t.co/odUC7tKebA
@Amiralgas @aziz0nomics You're very gullible aren't you? How do you suspect that Hamas got all those building materials to make the tunnels and weapons? Hmmm? Anyway, under International law, Gaza was not occupied. https://t.co/Yq8sQn5VQT
@aakha83 @leekern13 This article also explains why Gaza should no longer be considered occupied https://t.co/cPT1DXeDC0 Hamas does not recognize the state of Israel so no formal agreement was signed but it is clear also to the US that it is no longer occup
@mazputns @BensLatkovskis @liana_langa Strīds ir, pat ja Jūs strīdaties, ka nav https://t.co/ldyubiVROh. Izraēla kopš 2005.g. atstāja Gazas joslu, bet ANO to uzskata par okupētu ne jau tādēļ, ka tur atrodas Izraēlas spēki, bet IL (pamatoti) kontrolē lielāk
@bryndzovepirohy @MartinDuchon11 @MarekUnknow Sa tvárite, ako keby o tom bol konsenzus, čo rozhodne nie je. Viacerí experti tvrdia, že to okupácia nie je. To, že to bude tvrdiť UN alebo Amnesty je iná vec, tí sa ukázali už v ukr-rus vojne, kde stoja. https
@_JoelRayner @jessieevangel @gryzt @kiyahwillis “Given that there is no longer any effective control in the sense of Article 42 of the Hague Regulations, it is difficult to sustain that Gaza is still occupied” https://t.co/9FyiuSJ101
@Cbotia2000 @JudiciaIreview @krishnanrohit Gaza was and is occupied, screen is from wiki https://t.co/2fRGoJ7uSF , but you can go and read this referenced article: https://t.co/SdenMB7CHI https://t.co/O0axgtDiJz
@serwinnietdt @aziz0nomics @saeedwkhan It literally did end the occupation. Your understanding of the law and the situation is highly incomplete. Proof: https://t.co/mYSXW0aESh
@BenzionSanders welcome to read too https://t.co/jToBvQxzey
@Extrm8or @AlpharezCC @alirtariq @Kjp_0325 @ZedDaniel81 @HenMazzig This article gives no proof of its claims that Israel is occupying the Gaza strip from international law. This is the article that proves the opposite : https://t.co/2cF0Im2klC
@lamborghinibank @Hayzoosszn @NonKnower @TaliGoldsheft I once again state: the credibility of the UN and anyone associated with them is worthless after Oct 7th. The reason Israel maintains a blockade on Gaza is because of a genuine security concern, and Oc
@Mifield @Jewishlaser46 @FabioA @fred_guttenberg @Grant_Gehring No, the UN is institutionally anti-Semitic. The Jewish State is the ONLY member nation not permitted to sit on the Security Council. But if u want a scholarly analysis of whether Israel occupi
@fishandwhistles @GhostOfSocrates The link to the article regarding disputes. https://t.co/l6xq0YtJ55
@rasmus_hen @cephei01 @der_neukoellner @ShahakShapira @GretaThunberg Wie gesagt, es ist umstritten: https://t.co/3r9wBBEIsY
@Shankss_Pony @MunawarIfaz @psyche1129 @hahussain You keep mispelling Egypt, it's E G Y P T. It's not universally acknowledged, it is false and is disputed by most scholars because there is no occupation. Except maybe Iran that chairs the UN human rights f
@gabi_ski @eyalredler @stupidtidyy @SanaSaeed You keep dodging the hard questions. You can't even explain in simple terms how it is occupied. I literally live here. In that report you mentioned, they didn't even enter Gaza. Egypt didn't allow them to. Her
@FilBarbera Infatti sbaglia la signora Albanese. Esiste varia letteratura in tema https://t.co/63CzlYlr10 Che @PierluigiBattis non sia preparato potrebbe anche starci, che non lo sia la albanese mi fa sorridere
@TropicalNotes @ZueriHaris @paxlondonium @habibahamid @Naomi_Levy_ @shashj A blockade is not an occupation, that's why they are two different words with different meaning. Read the article I linked if you want to learn more 👇🏼 https://t.co/s7qijn9lUr
@ZueriHaris @paxlondonium @habibahamid @Naomi_Levy_ @shashj "...the effective control test at the core of the law of occupation is no longer met and hence Gaza is no longer occupied" https://t.co/s7qijn9lUr
"Is Israel Still an Occupying Power in Gaza?" di Hanne Cuyckens, Assistant Professor of International Law, University of Leiden. https://t.co/YwpMoiCYCo
@RalphJanik Dazu eine recht ausführliche Studie https://t.co/s7qijn9lUr
@Jacob_TLV @MuhammadSmiry Take a look at these facts: https://t.co/1NA6mSHJMu https://t.co/Vrzl5TqfJD
@FANSSNomad "even though the majority argues that the Gaza Strip is still occupied, the effective control test at the core of the law of occupation is no longer met and hence Gaza is no longer occupied" https://t.co/nT4hk3y8uX
@csilfverstolpe @KenRoth An interesting interpretation can be found here: https://t.co/bOkXqEjR1P
@amaherYAH @yaakob_elisha @simon_schama On that point: "even though the majority argues that the Gaza Strip is still occupied, the effective control test at the core of the law of occupation is no longer met and hence Gaza is no longer occupied." 👇🏼 ht
@MiddleAgedJoker @zbappahta @rsrindy @shailjapatel I can't find convincing arguments that Israel has had Gaza under occupation beyond 2005 I find sections 3.1 and 3.2 of the link below convincing https://t.co/ZdEEs5Gdw0
@Musti_Moabit_43 @Kritik_u_Krise @gepardtatze @tagesschau @newswatch4u Die UN ist keine neutrale oder juristische Einrichtung. Der ICJ wäre entscheidend, da gibt es aber kein entsprechendes Urteil. Wissenschaftler kommen zum Schluss, das es keine Besetzu
@JakubSzanto Jen dotaz: Jestli to chápu správně, argument Hausdorff předpokládá, že od stažení vojsk z Pásma Gazy neokupuje Izrael toto území. Namátkou totiž ukazují názory odborníků tenhle výklad jako kontroverzní. Sedí to? https://t.co/NXHKYvPlQV
@SlootLau Wie verdedigt Hamas? Het is een verschrikkelijke terroristische organisatie. Dat gezegd hebbende ontslaat je dat niet om verder te kijken dan je neus lang is Laurens, ipv van goedkope tweets zonder enige context. Het is ophitserij en maakt nieman
@Zedcalmo https://t.co/s7qijn9lUr "...the effective control test at the core of the law of occupation is no longer met and hence Gaza is no longer occupied."
@hundred_from @CaitlinPacific How convincing do find the arguments that Israel has had Gaza under occupation beyond 2005? To my mind, Sections 3.1 and 3.2 put those arguments to rest https://t.co/ZdEEs5Gdw0
@erik_wt @gertjansegers @gertboeve Er is geen sprake van effectieve controle, Hamas is de baas in Gaza: https://t.co/16NNE4RWBa
@feestbrood @gertjansegers @gertboeve In 2005 heeft Israël uit eigen beweging de 21 nederzettingen ontmanteld en daarna de militaire bezetting gestaakt en zich teruggetrokken. Israël heeft geen effectieve controle over Gaza, Hamas is er de baas. https://t.
RT @AndrewChapman50: @SkyNews There is no occupation. For a legal statement of the obvious see: https://t.co/GnvOIL4qZn https://t.co/c5hc…
@SkyNews There is no occupation. For a legal statement of the obvious see: https://t.co/GnvOIL4qZn https://t.co/c5hcPs85Q6
@chaluny @michaeljswalker Just goes to show it is more nuanced than simply being occupied or not. Just because you're controlling almost everything from the outside does not strip Israel of responsibilities and accountability. Another paper for you. https
RT @StoicViper: The issue with claiming that Israel still occupies Gaza is that Israel does not meet the effective control test stipulated…
The issue with claiming that Israel still occupies Gaza is that Israel does not meet the effective control test stipulated under international law for occupation. Great paper by Hanne Cuyckens breaking down the legality can be found here: https://t.co/XeC
@noah_guttman @IDFsoldiergirl @2noPropaganda2 @emilykschrader @hrw @amnesty @LevittOra And now you, Noah, the one who gets it most correct. WB is occupied and agreed that there is some kind of arguments if Gaza is occupied or not. Legal scholar Hanne Cuyck
While Israel occupied Gaza in the past, the Strip is currently not occupied. Even by IL and UN use of term effective control, Israel fails to meet that definition due to agreements w/ PA and lack of enforcement of control. (Will link journal below). https
RT @StoicViper: Withdrawal of Israeli military forces and civilian infastructure (settlements, etc.) from Gaza ended the occupation of Gaza…
One final note on Gaza's status. I note here that currently Gaza is not occupied by Israel. Contrary to what most think: https://t.co/R2eYgW1KRz
Withdrawal of Israeli military forces and civilian infastructure (settlements, etc.) from Gaza ended the occupation of Gaza. Hamas was elected soon after and kicked out Fatah completely in 2007 after power struggle. Blockades by Israel and Egypt followed.
@Anticonspiracy2 @Addamo4 @UN_HRC There is no effective control or occupation of gaza by israel under article 42 of the Hague convention. Long but very interesting read. https://t.co/0fMV2L55oI
@gabrielboric @catafernandezc @nachorancaguino De todas maneras, el asunto es discutible incluso para expertos en el tema, por ende le(s) recomendaría no ser tan categórico(s). Acá le(s) envío alguna bibliografía: https://t.co/I40aEAZWRd https://t.co/GotZk
RT @thesluis: @RikDelhaas @vpro De jure is er geen sprake van bezetting. Zie bv. https://t.co/moLhkPb538 Hooguit volgens het internat. rech…
RT @thesluis: @RikDelhaas @vpro De jure is er geen sprake van bezetting. Zie bv. https://t.co/moLhkPb538 Hooguit volgens het internat. rech…
RT @thesluis: @RikDelhaas @vpro De jure is er geen sprake van bezetting. Zie bv. https://t.co/moLhkPb538 Hooguit volgens het internat. rech…
@RikDelhaas @vpro De jure is er geen sprake van bezetting. Zie bv. https://t.co/moLhkPb538 Hooguit volgens het internat. recht een aantal verplichtingen.