↓ Skip to main content

How effective are buffer zones in managing invasive beavers in Patagonia? A simulation study

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity & Conservation, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
How effective are buffer zones in managing invasive beavers in Patagonia? A simulation study
Published in
Biodiversity & Conservation, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10531-017-1373-1
Authors

Alejandro G. Pietrek, Gina K. Himes Boor, William F. Morris

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Other 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 36%
Environmental Science 3 27%
Unspecified 2 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 9%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2017.
All research outputs
#6,278,087
of 11,400,239 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity & Conservation
#766
of 1,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,615
of 267,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity & Conservation
#27
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,400,239 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.