↓ Skip to main content

CT differentiation of 1–2-cm gallbladder polyps: benign vs malignant

Overview of attention for article published in Abdominal Imaging, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
CT differentiation of 1–2-cm gallbladder polyps: benign vs malignant
Published in
Abdominal Imaging, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00261-013-0071-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

E Rang Song, Woo-Suk Chung, Hye Young Jang, Minjae Yoon, Eun Jung Cha

Abstract

To evaluate MDCT findings of 1-2-cm sized gallbladder (GB) polyps for differentiation between benign and malignant polyps.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 33%
Researcher 2 33%
Professor 1 17%
Librarian 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 83%
Unspecified 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2014.
All research outputs
#9,771,517
of 12,228,878 outputs
Outputs from Abdominal Imaging
#163
of 247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,354
of 221,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Abdominal Imaging
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,228,878 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 247 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.