↓ Skip to main content

Good teaching feels good—but what is “good teaching”? Exploring teachers’ definitions of teaching success in mathematics

Overview of attention for article published in ZDM, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Good teaching feels good—but what is “good teaching”? Exploring teachers’ definitions of teaching success in mathematics
Published in
ZDM, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11858-017-0848-6
Authors

Barbara Jacob, Anne C. Frenzel, Elizabeth J. Stephens

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 19%
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 17 53%
Arts and Humanities 4 13%
Mathematics 4 13%
Unspecified 4 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 2 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2017.
All research outputs
#6,294,801
of 11,128,006 outputs
Outputs from ZDM
#368
of 563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,842
of 265,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ZDM
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,128,006 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 563 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.