↓ Skip to main content

Improved methods for measuring forest landscape structure: LiDAR complements field-based habitat assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity & Conservation, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
Title
Improved methods for measuring forest landscape structure: LiDAR complements field-based habitat assessment
Published in
Biodiversity & Conservation, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10531-013-0600-7
Authors

Florian Zellweger, Felix Morsdorf, Ross S. Purves, Veronika Braunisch, Kurt Bollmann

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 3%
United States 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Switzerland 2 1%
France 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 124 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 29%
Student > Master 27 19%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 30 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 56 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 34%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 12%
Unspecified 14 10%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 4 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2014.
All research outputs
#10,937,180
of 12,340,632 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity & Conservation
#1,155
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,101
of 222,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity & Conservation
#28
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,340,632 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.