↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative analysis of dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT for measurement of lung inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in EJNMMI Research, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Quantitative analysis of dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT for measurement of lung inflammation
Published in
EJNMMI Research, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13550-017-0291-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Coello, Marie Fisk, Divya Mohan, Frederick J. Wilson, Andrew P. Brown, Michael I. Polkey, Ian Wilkinson, Ruth Tal-Singer, Philip S. Murphy, Joseph Cheriyan, Roger N. Gunn

Abstract

An inflammatory reaction in the airways and lung parenchyma, comprised mainly of neutrophils and alveolar macrophages, is present in some patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Thoracic fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has been proposed as a promising imaging biomarker to assess this inflammation. We sought to introduce a fully quantitative analysis method and compare this with previously published studies based on the Patlak approach using a dataset comprising (18)F-FDG PET scans from COPD subjects with elevated circulating inflammatory markers (fibrinogen) and matched healthy volunteers (HV). Dynamic (18)F-FDG PET scans were obtained for high-fibrinogen (>2.8 g/l) COPD subjects (N = 10) and never smoking HV (N = 10). Lungs were segmented using co-registered computed tomography images and subregions (upper, middle and lower) were semi-automatically defined. A quantitative analysis approach was developed, which corrects for the presence of air and blood in the lung (qABL method), enabling direct estimation of the metabolic rate of FDG in lung tissue. A normalised Patlak analysis approach was also performed to enable comparison with previously published results. Effect sizes (Hedge's g) were used to compare HV and COPD groups. The qABL method detected no difference (Hedge's g = 0.15 [-0.76 1.04]) in the tissue metabolic rate of FDG in the whole lung between HV (μ = 6.0 ± 1.9 × 10(-3) ml cm(-3) min(-1)) and COPD (μ = 5.7 ± 1.7 × 10(-3) ml cm(-3) min(-1)). However, analysis with the normalised Patlak approach detected a significant difference (Hedge's g = -1.59 [-2.57 -0.48]) in whole lung between HV (μ = 2.9 ± 0.5 × 10(-3) ml cm(-3) min(-1)) and COPD (μ = 3.9 ± 0.7 × 10(-3) ml cm(-3) min(-1)). The normalised Patlak endpoint was shown to be a composite measure influenced by air volume, blood volume and actual uptake of (18)F-FDG in lung tissue. We have introduced a quantitative analysis method that provides a direct estimate of the metabolic rate of FDG in lung tissue. This work provides further understanding of the underlying origin of the (18)F-FDG signal in the lung in disease groups and helps interpreting changes following standard or novel therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Engineering 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2017.
All research outputs
#6,344,569
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#113
of 579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,676
of 314,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 579 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.