↓ Skip to main content

Is Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) a valid indicator for health systems evaluation?

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
Title
Is Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) a valid indicator for health systems evaluation?
Published in
SpringerPlus, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-664
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Romero, David Vivas-Consuelo, Nelson Alvis-Guzman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 281 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 14%
Student > Bachelor 36 13%
Student > Postgraduate 26 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 8%
Researcher 19 7%
Other 48 17%
Unknown 89 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 14%
Psychology 12 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 4%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 101 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2016.
All research outputs
#14,923,136
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#660
of 1,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,959
of 324,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#34
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.