↓ Skip to main content

Intervention to Improve Care at Life’s End in Inpatient Settings: The BEACON Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
30 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Intervention to Improve Care at Life’s End in Inpatient Settings: The BEACON Trial
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11606-013-2724-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Amos Bailey, Beverly R. Williams, Lesa L. Woodby, Patricia S. Goode, David T. Redden, Thomas K. Houston, U. Shanette Granstaff, Theodore M. Johnson, Leslye C. Pennypacker, K. Sue Haddock, John M. Painter, Jessie M. Spencer, Thomas Hartney, Kathryn L. Burgio

Abstract

Widespread implementation of palliative care treatment plans could reduce suffering in the last days of life by adopting best practices of traditionally home-based hospice care in inpatient settings.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 91 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 25%
Student > Master 16 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 26 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 23%
Unspecified 14 15%
Psychology 10 11%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Other 12 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2018.
All research outputs
#171,906
of 13,073,426 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#135
of 4,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,148
of 240,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,073,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.