| Title |
Intervention to Improve Care at Life’s End in Inpatient Settings: The BEACON Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-013-2724-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F. Amos Bailey, Beverly R. Williams, Lesa L. Woodby, Patricia S. Goode, David T. Redden, Thomas K. Houston, U. Shanette Granstaff, Theodore M. Johnson, Leslye C. Pennypacker, K. Sue Haddock, John M. Painter, Jessie M. Spencer, Thomas Hartney, Kathryn L. Burgio |
| Abstract |
Widespread implementation of palliative care treatment plans could reduce suffering in the last days of life by adopting best practices of traditionally home-based hospice care in inpatient settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 52% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Georgia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 74% |
| Scientists | 5 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 21% |
| Unknown | 37 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Psychology | 11 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 50 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2022.
All research outputs
#488,915
of 25,396,120 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#380
of 8,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,836
of 320,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#7
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,396,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.