↓ Skip to main content

Risky Business: Risk Perception and the Use of Medical Services among Customers of DTC Personal Genetic Testing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
Title
Risky Business: Risk Perception and the Use of Medical Services among Customers of DTC Personal Genetic Testing
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10897-012-9483-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J. Kaufman, Juli M. Bollinger, Rachel L. Dvoskin, Joan A. Scott

Abstract

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing has generated speculation about how customers will interpret results and how these interpretations will influence healthcare use and behavior; however, few empirical data on these topics exist. We conducted an online survey of DTC customers of 23andMe, deCODEme, and Navigenics to begin to address these questions. Random samples of U.S. DTC customers were invited to participate. Survey topics included demographics, perceptions of two sample DTC results, and health behaviors following DTC testing. Of 3,167 DTC customers invited, 33% (n = 1,048) completed the survey. Forty-three percent of respondents had sought additional information about a health condition tested; 28% had discussed their results with a healthcare professional; and 9% had followed up with additional lab tests. Sixteen percent of respondents had changed a medication or supplement regimen, and one-third said they were being more careful about their diet. Many of these health-related behaviors were significantly associated with responses to a question that asked how participants would perceive their colon cancer risk (as low, moderate, or high) if they received a test result showing an 11% lifetime risk, as compared to 5% risk in the general population. Respondents who would consider themselves to be at high risk for colon cancer were significantly more likely to have sought information about a disease (p = 0.03), discussed results with a physician (p = 0.05), changed their diet (p = 0.02), and started exercising more (p = 0.01). Participants' personal health contexts--including personal and family history of disease and quality of self-perceived health--were also associated with health-related behaviors after testing. Subjective interpretations of genetic risk data and personal context appear to be related to health behaviors among DTC customers. Sharing DTC test results with healthcare professionals may add perceived utility to the tests.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 199 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 23%
Researcher 32 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 30 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 13%
Social Sciences 22 11%
Psychology 17 8%
Other 48 23%
Unknown 33 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2014.
All research outputs
#1,631,033
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#54
of 1,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,606
of 246,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.