↓ Skip to main content

A prospective randomised radiostereometric analysis trial of SmartSet HV and Palacos R bone cements in primary total hip arthroplasty

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
A prospective randomised radiostereometric analysis trial of SmartSet HV and Palacos R bone cements in primary total hip arthroplasty
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10195-010-0087-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Otto S. Husby, Kristin Haugan, Pål Benum, Olav A. Foss

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Norway 1 3%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Researcher 4 14%
Other 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 55%
Psychology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,866,480
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#60
of 222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,636
of 95,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them