↓ Skip to main content

Reemergence of Chikungunya virus in Indian Subcontinent

Overview of attention for article published in VirusDisease, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Reemergence of Chikungunya virus in Indian Subcontinent
Published in
VirusDisease, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s13337-010-0012-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. V. M. Naresh Kumar, D. V. R. Sai Gopal

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Master 13 16%
Other 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 20 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from VirusDisease
#81
of 407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,450
of 104,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from VirusDisease
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 407 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.