↓ Skip to main content

The nature of ecstasy-group related deficits in associative learning

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
The nature of ecstasy-group related deficits in associative learning
Published in
Psychopharmacology, January 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00213-004-2131-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catharine Montgomery, John E. Fisk, Russell Newcombe

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Psychology 1 13%
Other 3 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2015.
All research outputs
#1,898,899
of 7,765,463 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#675
of 2,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,039
of 98,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,765,463 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 62nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.