↓ Skip to main content

Compensatory shifts in visual perception are associated with hallucinations in Lewy body disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Compensatory shifts in visual perception are associated with hallucinations in Lewy body disorders
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s41235-017-0063-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan Robert Bowman, Vicki Bruce, Christopher J. Colbourn, Daniel Collerton

Abstract

Visual hallucinations are a common, distressing, and disabling symptom of Lewy body and other diseases. Current models suggest that interactions in internal cognitive processes generate hallucinations. However, these neglect external factors. Pareidolic illusions are an experimental analogue of hallucinations. They are easily induced in Lewy body disease, have similar content to spontaneous hallucinations, and respond to cholinesterase inhibitors in the same way. We used a primed pareidolia task with hallucinating participants with Lewy body disorders (n = 16), non-hallucinating participants with Lewy body disorders (n = 19), and healthy controls (n = 20). Participants were presented with visual "noise" that sometimes contained degraded visual objects and were required to indicate what they saw. Some perceptions were cued in advance by a visual prime. Results showed that hallucinating participants were impaired in discerning visual signals from noise, with a relaxed criterion threshold for perception compared to both other groups. After the presentation of a visual prime, the criterion was comparable to the other groups. The results suggest that participants with hallucinations compensate for perceptual deficits by relaxing perceptual criteria, at a cost of seeing things that are not there, and that visual cues regularize perception. This latter finding may provide a mechanism for understanding the interaction between environments and hallucinations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Other 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 21%
Psychology 7 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 16 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2017.
All research outputs
#14,347,579
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#240
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,321
of 313,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.