↓ Skip to main content

Panarchy: Theory and Application

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
524 Mendeley
Title
Panarchy: Theory and Application
Published in
Ecosystems, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10021-013-9744-2
Authors

Craig R. Allen, David G. Angeler, Ahjond S. Garmestani, Lance H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 524 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 2%
South Africa 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Sweden 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 484 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 151 29%
Researcher 97 19%
Student > Master 97 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 7%
Unspecified 25 5%
Other 115 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 175 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 17%
Social Sciences 72 14%
Unspecified 54 10%
Engineering 27 5%
Other 108 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2014.
All research outputs
#1,793,380
of 13,181,286 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#171
of 813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,340
of 288,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,181,286 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.