| Title |
A process model on P2P lending
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Financial Innovation, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40854-015-0002-9 |
| Authors |
Huaiqing Wang, Kun Chen, Wei Zhu, Zhenxia Song |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 180 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 83 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 40 | 22% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 30 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 84 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,528,244
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from Financial Innovation
#52
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,964
of 266,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Financial Innovation
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.