↓ Skip to main content

Tsunami runup and tide-gauge observations from the 14 November 2016 M7.8 Kaikōura earthquake, New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in Pure and Applied Geophysics, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Tsunami runup and tide-gauge observations from the 14 November 2016 M7.8 Kaikōura earthquake, New Zealand
Published in
Pure and Applied Geophysics, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00024-017-1566-2
Authors

William Power, Kate Clark, Darren N. King, Jose Borrero, Jamie Howarth, Emily M. Lane, Derek Goring, James Goff, Catherine Chagué-Goff, James Williams, Catherine Reid, Colin Whittaker, Christof Mueller, Shaun Williams, Matthew W. Hughes, Jo Hoyle, Jochen Bind, Delia Strong, Nicola Litchfield, Adrian Benson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 27%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 55%
Environmental Science 5 11%
Computer Science 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 8 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2017.
All research outputs
#5,255,295
of 25,247,212 outputs
Outputs from Pure and Applied Geophysics
#112
of 854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,495
of 316,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pure and Applied Geophysics
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,247,212 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.