↓ Skip to main content

Tsunami runup and tide-gauge observations from the 14 November 2016 M7.8 Kaikōura earthquake, New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in Pure & Applied Geophysics, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 372)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Tsunami runup and tide-gauge observations from the 14 November 2016 M7.8 Kaikōura earthquake, New Zealand
Published in
Pure & Applied Geophysics, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00024-017-1566-2
Authors

William Power, Kate Clark, Darren N. King, Jose Borrero, Jamie Howarth, Emily M. Lane, Derek Goring, James Goff, Catherine Chagué-Goff, James Williams, Catherine Reid, Colin Whittaker, Christof Mueller, Shaun Williams, Matthew W. Hughes, Jo Hoyle, Jochen Bind, Delia Strong, Nicola Litchfield, Adrian Benson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Student > Master 3 16%
Other 1 5%
Student > Postgraduate 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 74%
Environmental Science 2 11%
Computer Science 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,509,925
of 12,891,000 outputs
Outputs from Pure & Applied Geophysics
#27
of 372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,930
of 261,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pure & Applied Geophysics
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,891,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 372 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them