↓ Skip to main content

The application of non-invasive genetic tagging reveals new insights into the clay lick use by macaws in the Peruvian Amazon

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
The application of non-invasive genetic tagging reveals new insights into the clay lick use by macaws in the Peruvian Amazon
Published in
Conservation Genetics, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10592-017-0954-6
Authors

George Olah, Robert G. Heinsohn, Donald J. Brightsmith, Rod Peakall

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 18%
Student > Master 3 18%
Unspecified 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Other 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 53%
Unspecified 4 24%
Environmental Science 3 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,652,098
of 13,572,020 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#102
of 691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,142
of 263,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,572,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.