@salonium Age groups are not that clear cut if you look at a lot of research, some of it is downright fuzzy. Check out our paper https://t.co/Mie8NtmdQm
@san_muly לא מאד מפתיע כשהתחום מבוסס על עצי החלטה, וקשה להחליף במשהו יותר fuzzy. כתבנו על זה פעם מאמר, עם הצעה להפוך את טווח הגילאים להתפלגות על גילאים (בהקשר של מחקר, לא bedside): https://t.co/RbCIn6zhpe
@CoquiTalksTrash @GCustom Gonna try to get through this. It's written in mostly english. https://t.co/If7sax1xbi
@patti_feliciano @CharlieDonahue4 @Barnes_Law It’s entirely possible 45-64 is appropriate, but impossible to say for sure without seeing the underlying data. Just cause you *feel* you shouldn’t be lumped in with 64 y.o doesn’t mean you shouldn’t. https://t
@yoavgo Here I used LDA as a black box to cluster diseases by ages http://t.co/AkwhPFsRKO
@yoavgo Here I used LDA as a black box to cluster diseases by ages http://t.co/AkwhPFsRKO