↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Social Work Journal, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Clinical Social Work Journal, January 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1025734528329
Authors

David Klugman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 20%
Unspecified 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 27%
Social Sciences 3 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 20%
Unspecified 2 13%
Arts and Humanities 2 13%
Other 1 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2013.
All research outputs
#9,838,325
of 12,318,771 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Social Work Journal
#445
of 979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,679
of 217,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Social Work Journal
#15
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,318,771 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 979 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.