↓ Skip to main content

Paternal effects on Apis mellifera capensis worker ovary size

Overview of attention for article published in Apidologie, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Paternal effects on Apis mellifera capensis worker ovary size
Published in
Apidologie, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13592-017-0510-x
Authors

Rebecca J. Reid, Emily J. Remnant, Michael H. Allsopp, Madeleine Beekman, Benjamin P. Oldroyd

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 5 33%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 73%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2017.
All research outputs
#4,294,732
of 9,896,588 outputs
Outputs from Apidologie
#199
of 364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,707
of 263,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Apidologie
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,896,588 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 56th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.