↓ Skip to main content

Short and lifetime cardiovascular risk estimates: Same wine, different bottles. Do we have the COURAGE to abandon risk scores?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Short and lifetime cardiovascular risk estimates: Same wine, different bottles. Do we have the COURAGE to abandon risk scores?
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12350-013-9838-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khurram Nasir, Michael J. Blaha

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2013.
All research outputs
#9,750,449
of 12,199,521 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#845
of 1,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,897
of 213,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#32
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,199,521 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.