| Title |
Undergraduate students’ conceptual interpretation and perceptions of haptic-enabled learning experiences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41239-017-0053-2 |
| Authors |
Uzma A. S. Shaikh, Alejandra J. Magana, Luis Neri, David Escobar-Castillejos, Julieta Noguez, Bedrich Benes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 21 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 9% |
| Engineering | 8 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 25% |
| Unknown | 24 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,208,606
of 24,649,404 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#227
of 415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,163
of 315,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,649,404 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.