↓ Skip to main content

A threat to a virtual hand elicits motor cortex activation

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
Title
A threat to a virtual hand elicits motor cortex activation
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00221-013-3800-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mar González-Franco, Tabitha C. Peck, Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells, Mel Slater

Abstract

We report an experiment where participants observed an attack on their virtual body as experienced in an immersive virtual reality (IVR) system. Participants sat by a table with their right hand resting upon it. In IVR, they saw a virtual table that was registered with the real one, and they had a virtual body that substituted their real body seen from a first person perspective. The virtual right hand was collocated with their real right hand. Event-related brain potentials were recorded in two conditions, one where the participant's virtual hand was attacked with a knife and a control condition where the knife only struck the virtual table. Significantly greater P450 potentials were obtained in the attack condition confirming our expectations that participants had a strong illusion of the virtual hand being their own, which was also strongly supported by questionnaire responses. Higher levels of subjective virtual hand ownership correlated with larger P450 amplitudes. Mu-rhythm event-related desynchronization in the motor cortex and readiness potential (C3-C4) negativity were clearly observed when the virtual hand was threatened-as would be expected, if the real hand was threatened and the participant tried to avoid harm. Our results support the idea that event-related potentials may provide a promising non-subjective measure of virtual embodiment. They also support previous experiments on pain observation and are placed into context of similar experiments and studies of body perception and body ownership within cognitive neuroscience.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 251 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 20%
Researcher 37 14%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 9%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 56 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 54 21%
Computer Science 37 14%
Neuroscience 31 12%
Engineering 21 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 67 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,652,468
of 23,937,746 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#698
of 3,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,699
of 315,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#10
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,937,746 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.