Title |
Coenzyme Q10 improves endothelial dysfunction of the brachial artery in Type II diabetes mellitus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Diabetologia, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00125-001-0760-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
G. F. Watts, D. A. Playford, K. D. Croft, N. C. Ward, T. A. Mori, V. Burke |
Abstract |
We assessed whether dietary supplementation with coenzyme Q(10) improves endothelial function of the brachial artery in patients with Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and dyslipidaemia. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 86 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 23% |
Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 14% |
Unknown | 21 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 26% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
Psychology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 13% |
Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2019.
All research outputs
#18,357,514
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#4,673
of 5,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,573
of 226,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#58
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.