↓ Skip to main content

Underground organs of Brazilian Asteraceae: testing the CLO-PLA database traits

Overview of attention for article published in Folia Geobotanica, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Underground organs of Brazilian Asteraceae: testing the CLO-PLA database traits
Published in
Folia Geobotanica, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12224-016-9266-8
Authors

Arinawa Liz Filartiga, Jitka Klimešová, Beatriz Appezzato-da-Glória

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 30%
Researcher 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 50%
Environmental Science 3 30%
Unspecified 2 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,530,016
of 9,768,421 outputs
Outputs from Folia Geobotanica
#88
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,899
of 263,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Geobotanica
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,768,421 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.