↓ Skip to main content

Hypoxia and cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Medicine, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
623 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
645 Mendeley
Title
Hypoxia and cancer
Published in
Journal of Molecular Medicine, November 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00109-007-0281-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Christiane Brahimi-Horn, Johanna Chiche, Jacques Pouysségur

Abstract

A major feature of solid tumours is hypoxia, decreased availability of oxygen, which increases patient treatment resistance and favours tumour progression. How hypoxic conditions are generated in tumour tissues and how cells respond to hypoxia are essential questions in understanding tumour progression and metastasis. Massive tumour-cell proliferation distances cells from the vasculature, leading to a deficiency in the local environment of blood carrying oxygen and nutrients. Such hypoxic conditions induce a molecular response, in both normal and neoplastic cells, that drives the activation of a key transcription factor; the hypoxia-inducible factor. This transcription factor regulates a large panel of genes that are exploited by tumour cells for survival, resistance to treatment and escape from a nutrient-deprived environment. Although now recognized as a major contributor to cancer progression and to treatment failure, the precise role of hypoxia signalling in cancer and in prognosis still needs to be further defined. It is hoped that a better understanding of the mechanisms implicated will lead to alternative and more efficient therapeutic approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 645 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 624 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 128 20%
Student > Master 99 15%
Student > Bachelor 87 13%
Researcher 80 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 5%
Other 73 11%
Unknown 147 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 141 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 135 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 63 10%
Chemistry 48 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 4%
Other 70 11%
Unknown 165 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,032,943
of 24,717,692 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#54
of 1,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,058
of 165,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.