Title |
Predictability of 2-year La Niña events in a coupled general circulation model
|
---|---|
Published in |
Climate Dynamics, March 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00382-017-3575-3 |
Authors |
Pedro N. DiNezio, Clara Deser, Yuko Okumura, Alicia Karspeck |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 25% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 16 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 31 | 51% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 19 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,778,233
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#365
of 5,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,040
of 310,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#9
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.