↓ Skip to main content

Fruit and Seed Dispersal of Salvia L. (Lamiaceae): A Review of the Evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Botanical Review, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 139)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Fruit and Seed Dispersal of Salvia L. (Lamiaceae): A Review of the Evidence
Published in
Botanical Review, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12229-017-9189-y
Authors

Scott Zona

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 75%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,812,048
of 8,603,937 outputs
Outputs from Botanical Review
#20
of 139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,461
of 252,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Botanical Review
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,603,937 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.