↓ Skip to main content

Neuromechanical coupling during mechanical ventilation: reverse-triggering vs others forms of asynchrony

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Neuromechanical coupling during mechanical ventilation: reverse-triggering vs others forms of asynchrony
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/2197-425x-3-s1-a997
Pubmed ID
Authors

JA Benitez Lozano, F Ruiz Ferron, P Carmona Sanchez, JM Serrano Simon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 57%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,414,746
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#366
of 449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,094
of 275,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#66
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.