↓ Skip to main content

Epistemic Virtues Versus Ethical Values in the Financial Services Sector

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Epistemic Virtues Versus Ethical Values in the Financial Services Sector
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10551-017-3547-x
Authors

Emma Borg, Bradford Hooker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Lecturer 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2017.
All research outputs
#3,950,406
of 8,554,039 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#669
of 1,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,159
of 250,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#28
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,554,039 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 52nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.