↓ Skip to main content

Cataclysm No More: New Views on the Timing and Delivery of Lunar Impactors

Overview of attention for article published in Origins of Life & Evolution of the Biosphere, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 402)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Cataclysm No More: New Views on the Timing and Delivery of Lunar Impactors
Published in
Origins of Life & Evolution of the Biosphere, May 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11084-017-9536-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolle E. B. Zellner

Abstract

If properly interpreted, the impact record of the Moon, Earth's nearest neighbour, can be used to gain insights into how the Earth has been influenced by impacting events since its formation ~4.5 billion years (Ga) ago. However, the nature and timing of the lunar impactors - and indeed the lunar impact record itself - are not well understood. Of particular interest are the ages of lunar impact basins and what they tell us about the proposed "lunar cataclysm" and/or the late heavy bombardment (LHB), and how this impact episode may have affected early life on Earth or other planets. Investigations of the lunar impactor population over time have been undertaken and include analyses of orbital data and images; lunar, terrestrial, and other planetary sample data; and dynamical modelling. Here, the existing information regarding the nature of the lunar impact record is reviewed and new interpretations are presented. Importantly, it is demonstrated that most evidence supports a prolonged lunar (and thus, terrestrial) bombardment from ~4.2 to 3.4 Ga and not a cataclysmic spike at ~3.9 Ga. Implications for the conditions required for the origin of life are addressed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Slovenia 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Master 6 16%
Other 5 14%
Professor 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 43%
Physics and Astronomy 6 16%
Chemistry 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 7 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,542,104
of 15,848,357 outputs
Outputs from Origins of Life & Evolution of the Biosphere
#37
of 402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,672
of 267,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Origins of Life & Evolution of the Biosphere
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,848,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.