| Title |
Rat feeding studies with genetically modified maize - a comparative evaluation of applied methods and risk assessment standards
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Sciences Europe, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2190-4715-25-33 |
| Authors |
Hartmut Meyer, Angelika Hilbeck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 21% |
| Belgium | 4 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 36 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 62 | 86% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 7% |
| Scientists | 3 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 20% |
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 17% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2023.
All research outputs
#630,610
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Sciences Europe
#37
of 618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,212
of 322,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Sciences Europe
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them