| Title |
Prediction of muscular architecture of the rectus femoris and vastus lateralis from EMG during isometric contractions in soccer players
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
SpringerPlus, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2193-1801-2-548 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bhawesh Chauhan, Maher A Hamzeh, Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas |
| Abstract |
The purpose of the study was to establish regression equations that could be used to predict muscle thickness and pennation angle at different intensities from electromyography (EMG) based measures of muscle activation during isometric contractions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 24 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 12% |
| Engineering | 6 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2016.
All research outputs
#14,640,348
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#823
of 1,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,223
of 211,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#49
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.