Title |
Hypernatremia in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/2110-5820-3-35 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leif Kolmodin, Mypinder S Sekhon, William R Henderson, Alexis F Turgeon, Donald EG Griesdale |
Abstract |
Hypernatremia is common following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and occurs from a variety of mechanisms, including hyperosmotic fluids, limitation of free water, or diabetes insipidus. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the relationship between hypernatremia and mortality in patients with TBI. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Costa Rica | 1 | 25% |
Australia | 1 | 25% |
Turkey | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Czechia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 97 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 19 | 19% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 10% |
Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 8% |
Other | 21 | 21% |
Unknown | 21 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 61% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 3% |
Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,128,291
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#568
of 1,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,808
of 215,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.