↓ Skip to main content

Conceptual Model Development for Holistic Building Fire Safety Performance Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Fire Technology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 503)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Conceptual Model Development for Holistic Building Fire Safety Performance Analysis
Published in
Fire Technology, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10694-013-0374-1
Authors

Haejun Park, Brian J. Meacham, Nicholas A. Dembsey, Mark Goulthorpe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 30%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 20 61%
Design 3 9%
Computer Science 2 6%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 4 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,045,500
of 13,520,735 outputs
Outputs from Fire Technology
#42
of 503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,917
of 250,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Technology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,520,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 503 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them