Title |
Finding the traces of behavioral and cognitive processes in big data and naturally occurring datasets
|
---|---|
Published in |
Behavior Research Methods, April 2017
|
DOI | 10.3758/s13428-017-0874-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alexandra Paxton, Thomas L. Griffiths |
Abstract |
Today, people generate and store more data than ever before as they interact with both real and virtual environments. These digital traces of behavior and cognition offer cognitive scientists and psychologists an unprecedented opportunity to test theories outside the laboratory. Despite general excitement about big data and naturally occurring datasets among researchers, three "gaps" stand in the way of their wider adoption in theory-driven research: the imagination gap, the skills gap, and the culture gap. We outline an approach to bridging these three gaps while respecting our responsibilities to the public as participants in and consumers of the resulting research. To that end, we introduce Data on the Mind ( http://www.dataonthemind.org ), a community-focused initiative aimed at meeting the unprecedented challenges and opportunities of theory-driven research with big data and naturally occurring datasets. We argue that big data and naturally occurring datasets are most powerfully used to supplement-not supplant-traditional experimental paradigms in order to understand human behavior and cognition, and we highlight emerging ethical issues related to the collection, sharing, and use of these powerful datasets. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 24% |
Australia | 1 | 6% |
Denmark | 1 | 6% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
India | 1 | 6% |
Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
Singapore | 1 | 6% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
France | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 47% |
Scientists | 7 | 41% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 13% |
Researcher | 11 | 10% |
Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
Other | 24 | 22% |
Unknown | 15 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 36 | 33% |
Computer Science | 12 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Engineering | 5 | 5% |
Other | 20 | 18% |
Unknown | 24 | 22% |