↓ Skip to main content

Plants in aquatic ecosystems: current trends and future directions

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrobiologia, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 2,696)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Plants in aquatic ecosystems: current trends and future directions
Published in
Hydrobiologia, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10750-017-3190-7
Authors

Matthew T. O’Hare, Francisca C. Aguiar, Takashi Asaeda, Elisabeth S. Bakker, Patricia A. Chambers, John S. Clayton, Arnaud Elger, Teresa M. Ferreira, Elisabeth M. Gross, Iain D. M. Gunn, Angela M. Gurnell, Seppo Hellsten, Deborah E. Hofstra, Wei Li, Silvia Mohr, Sara Puijalon, Krzysztof Szoszkiewicz, Nigel J. Willby, Kevin A. Wood

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 23%
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 9 13%
Unspecified 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Other 19 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 27 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 31%
Unspecified 12 17%
Engineering 6 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 1 1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2018.
All research outputs
#621,590
of 12,673,944 outputs
Outputs from Hydrobiologia
#31
of 2,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,581
of 259,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrobiologia
#2
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,673,944 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,696 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.