@Stfko_memero @culturayevol @pitiklinov ¿Que los estudios carecen de validez externa porque los gemelos o las familias adoptivas son poco representativas de la población general? Hay muchos estudios que prueban todo lo contrario (una revisión de ellos aquí
RT @NiklasLangstrom: Good job. https://t.co/z4wuejXtsd
RT @NiklasLangstrom: Good job. https://t.co/z4wuejXtsd
RT @NiklasLangstrom: Good job. https://t.co/z4wuejXtsd
Good job. https://t.co/z4wuejXtsd
RT @Rosalind_Arden_: Good to see data on how similar twins are to non-twins. Underscores usefulness of classical twin studies. https://t.co…
RT @Rosalind_Arden_: Good to see data on how similar twins are to non-twins. Underscores usefulness of classical twin studies. https://t.co…
RT @Rosalind_Arden_: Good to see data on how similar twins are to non-twins. Underscores usefulness of classical twin studies. https://t.co…
RT @fsnole1: Are samples of twins different from non-twins? Not really (from our paper using American data). https://t.co/y6mzY425Sg https:…
RT @fsnole1: Are samples of twins different from non-twins? Not really (from our paper using American data). https://t.co/y6mzY425Sg https:…
RT @Rosalind_Arden_: Good to see data on how similar twins are to non-twins. Underscores usefulness of classical twin studies. https://t.co…
RT @Rosalind_Arden_: Good to see data on how similar twins are to non-twins. Underscores usefulness of classical twin studies. https://t.co…
RT @fsnole1: Are samples of twins different from non-twins? Not really (from our paper using American data). https://t.co/y6mzY425Sg https:…
RT @Rosalind_Arden_: Good to see data on how similar twins are to non-twins. Underscores usefulness of classical twin studies. https://t.co…
RT @Rosalind_Arden_: Good to see data on how similar twins are to non-twins. Underscores usefulness of classical twin studies. https://t.co…
RT @Rosalind_Arden_: Good to see data on how similar twins are to non-twins. Underscores usefulness of classical twin studies. https://t.co…
Good to see data on how similar twins are to non-twins. Underscores usefulness of classical twin studies. https://t.co/gWzzYNpLnF
RT @fsnole1: Are samples of twins different from non-twins? Not really (from our paper using American data). https://t.co/y6mzY425Sg https:…
RT @fsnole1: From our paper on generalizing twin data to non-twin subjects in a national sample https://t.co/y6mzY4jGJO https://t.co/rCnRkU…
Do results from twins samples generalize to the broader population of non-twins? Yep https://t.co/Zq1uEmiy5a
Our paper testing whether findings w/twins generalize to the broader population for a variety of traits. They do. https://t.co/y6mzY4jGJO
Our paper testing whether findings w/twins generalize to the broader population for a variety of traits. They do. https://t.co/y6mzY4jGJO
Our paper testing whether findings w/twins generalize to the broader population for a variety of traits. They do. https://t.co/y6mzY4jGJO
Do results from twins samples generalize to the broader population of non-twins? Yep https://t.co/Zq1uEmiy5a
A demonstration of the generalizability of twin-based research on antisocial behavior. http://t.co/OUKnLHrjHv