| Title |
An integrated agro-ecosystem and livelihood systems approach for the poor and vulnerable in dry areas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Food Security, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12571-013-0305-5 |
| Authors |
Maarten van Ginkel, Jeff Sayer, Fergus Sinclair, Aden Aw-Hassan, Deborah Bossio, Peter Craufurd, Mohammed El Mourid, Nasri Haddad, David Hoisington, Nancy Johnson, Carlos León Velarde, Víctor Mares, Andrew Mude, Ali Nefzaoui, Andrew Noble, K. P. C. Rao, Rachid Serraj, Shirley Tarawali, Raymond Vodouhe, Rodomiro Ortiz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 11% |
| Germany | 3 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Guyana | 2 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 5% |
| Kenya | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 86% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 212 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 56 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 47 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 13 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 51 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2017.
All research outputs
#889,464
of 24,451,685 outputs
Outputs from Food Security
#53
of 790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,184
of 221,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Security
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,451,685 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.