Title |
Evolution of practice gaps in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery: 2012 report from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Continuing Education Committee
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00464-013-3263-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John T. Paige, Timothy M. Farrell, Simon Bergman, Niazy Selim, Alan E. Harzman, Erin Schwarz, Yumi Hori, Jason Levine, Daniel J. Scott |
Abstract |
In an effort to fulfill its charge to develop and maintain a comprehensive educational program to serve the members of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), the SAGES Continuing Education Committee (CEC) reports a summary of findings related to its evaluation of the 2012 SAGES annual meeting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 17 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
Other | 3 | 17% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Other | 4 | 22% |
Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 50% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
Engineering | 2 | 11% |
Psychology | 1 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2014.
All research outputs
#15,284,663
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,781
of 6,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,451
of 215,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#37
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,014 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.