↓ Skip to main content

Is having more prerequisite knowledge better for learning from productive failure?

Overview of attention for article published in Instructional Science, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Is having more prerequisite knowledge better for learning from productive failure?
Published in
Instructional Science, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11251-016-9402-0
Authors

Pee Li Leslie Toh, Manu Kapur

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 15 22%
Mathematics 6 9%
Arts and Humanities 5 7%
Psychology 4 6%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 18 26%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2017.
All research outputs
#14,168,292
of 23,852,694 outputs
Outputs from Instructional Science
#262
of 485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,126
of 312,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Instructional Science
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,852,694 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.